Back
32· Cooling
Health & Science3h 24m ago
A study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify and characterize 511,550 core teams of persistent scientific collaborations, investigating their formation, productivity, and dissolution.
Archive Window: 7 Days Left
global research institutions
Who
scientists and research teams
What
A study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify and characterize 511,550 core teams of persistent scientific collaborations, investigating their formation, productivity, and dissolution.
When
Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:11:15 GMT · 3h 24m ago
Where
global research institutions ·
Why
Teams are fundamental for innovation and scientific advancement, and understanding the characteristics and dynamics of persistent collaborations is crucial for researchers, institutions, and funding agencies.
The Frontline Impact
How this affects you
Understanding the dynamics of persistent collaborations, including factors like age, affiliation, and scientific expertise, can inform strategies for fostering more effective and successful research teams globally. The study reveals that multi-university cores formed after 2000 show higher impact, possibly due to advances in communication technology.
Story chain
3 events in this thread- Health & Science3h 24m agoA study analyzed 205 million scientific papers since 1900 to identify 511,550 persistent core teams and investigate their career trajectories.Open article
- Currently Reading3h 24m agoA study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify and characterize 511,550 core teams of persistent scientific collaborations, investigating their formation, productivity, and dissolution.
- Health & Science3h 24m agoA study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify 511,550 core persistent collaborations and new insights about their formation, productivity, and dissolution.Open article