Back
46· Steady
Health & Science3h 22m ago
A study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify 511,550 core persistent collaborations and new insights about their formation, productivity, and dissolution.
Archive Window: 7 Days Left
global (implied by dataset covering world scientific publications)
Who
scientists and research teams
What
A study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify 511,550 core persistent collaborations and new insights about their formation, productivity, and dissolution.
When
Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:11:15 GMT · 3h 22m ago
Where
global (implied by dataset covering world scientific publications) ·
Why
to understand the dynamics of team careers in science, including how persistent collaborations form, are productive, and eventually dissolve, considering factors like size, age, affiliation, and scientific discipline.
The Frontline Impact
How this affects you
This research provides insights into the dynamics of scientific collaborations, informing researchers, institutions, and funding agencies on how to foster successful and long-lasting teams that drive innovation and advance modern science. The findings highlight the importance of factors like multi-university affiliations and balanced knowledge diversity for impact.
Story chain
3 events in this thread- Health & Science3h 22m agoA study analyzed 205 million scientific papers since 1900 to identify 511,550 persistent core teams and investigate their career trajectories.Open article
- Health & Science3h 22m agoA study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify and characterize 511,550 core teams of persistent scientific collaborations, investigating their formation, productivity, and dissolution.Open article
- Currently Reading3h 22m agoA study analyzed over 205 million scientific papers published since 1900 to identify 511,550 core persistent collaborations and new insights about their formation, productivity, and dissolution.