An Indian court sentenced three Kashmiri students for waging war, possessing prohibited arms, and conspiracy as members of a terrorist gang, but acquitted a fourth accused, Suhail Ahmed Bhat, criticizing the NIA for "miserably failing" to prove allegations against him.

How this affects you

The court's rebuke of the NIA highlights potential lapses in investigation and evidence presentation in high-profile terror cases, which could have implications for future prosecutions related to national security. The acquittal of a key alleged figure also underscores the legal burden of proof required even in cases involving serious charges.